#

Brett Caton's Fumblin' Tumblr

Do not read if under or over the age of 18. Not to be consumed with mangoes.

gholateg:

sindri42:

mornington-the-crescent:

disgruntled-foreign-patriarch:

under-the-arch:

borgesperovago:

sindri42:

mornington-the-crescent:

2urban2fantasy:

under-the-arch:

Starship Troopers “discourse” be like “fascism is when there’s a military”

Now granted, you can make the argument that the government is authoritarian. At least in the movies. You have to have a permit to reproduce, you can’t vote unless you served in the military (I think that’s the same as the books) but you’d have to be arguing in pretty bad faith to call it fascism.

Where is the oppression? Where is the censorship? They have a whole televised debate with a guy who doesn’t even think the bugs exist when the government clearly wants to go to war. Hell after a few defeats the leader steps down and is replaced by somebody more qualified. What fascist dictator would ever give up power like that? Not to mention, wealth and industry are booming. Kids go to school, they learn extensively how the government works, and are told “hey, you can join, be a part of the decision makers, but first you have to do some really grueling work”.

Fascism is a collectivist ideology, and Heinlein once commented that he was so fiercely individualist, that he made Ayn Rand look like a socialist.

The book of starship troopers is 100% anti-fascist. The first big problem is, the person who wrote the movie never read the book. He flipped through the first couple of pages without paying much attention, was disgusted by what he imagined he saw there, and decided to write the movie script as a parody of a book that didn’t actually exist.

That’s why there’s a bunch of commonalities right at the start, but put in a completely different and much stupider context. Like, the army recruiter with three missing limbs, in the books he had been provided with top tier cybernetic replacements which he deliberately took off before he worked at the recruiting station (a position he was selected for specifically because of his injuries) because the people in charge of the military wanted to make sure that nobody could ever sign up without seeing the consequences first-hand. In the movies he was turned into a joke about how incompetent the soldiers were.

The second big problem is, half the people working on the movie didn’t know what they were doing was supposed to be a joke. So half the crew might have been trying to make a biting political satire, but the other half were trying to make a genuine, albeit silly, action schlock. The end result being that a lot of the time the film seems to be genuinely rooting for the corrupt, incompetent, psuedo-fascist bullshit it started out by trying to mock.

Also: the ‘can’t vote unless you serve in the military’ thing is movie only. The rule in the books was that you can’t vote or hold office unless you do something that puts the needs of others ahead of your own for at least two years. In the backstory, the current government was formed out of a rebellion led by military veterans who had been sent to die in pointless wars by politicians who had never done anything that didn’t enrich themselves at the expense of their people, so they made a rule that limits the political power of anybody who hasn’t learned to actually serve others. But in the vast majority of cases that service consists of working in some administrative position or a customer service role or something, not active combat. In fact the majority of applicants don’t qualify to join the military, because every single soldier in the books is a hyper-competent agent expected to be able to single-handedly take out a full squadron of enemy tanks (if anybody is stupid enough to send tanks at them).

Really important question: was Buenos Aires also destroyed in the book?

Yes? I believe it happens the same way, maybe a bit different

so it’s a case of Hollywood shitbags fucking up again?

In the book, Johnny Rico is actually from the Philippines, not Argentina.

Also in the book Johnnie is a nickname for Juan, and his native language is Tagalog, because Heinlein was heavily in favor of racial diversity and wanted to portray it as one of the strengths of the military he was writing about, in contrast to the communist Bugs being entirely homogenous.

But then in the movie they decided to make him blond and blue-eyed without the slightest trace of a filipino accent because reasons.

The bugs were also not quadrupeds/animalistic if I remember right. They far more humanoid looking and fully capable of dropping a rail gun shot at Earth.

(via lordascapelion)

image

Young Vlad, eager to try out his new impaling chair.

ophilosoraptoro:

feminismisstillahatemovement:

mistah-oso:

feminismisstillahatemovement:

image

No, Desantis’ law is awful. it has lead to book bans. you know the things you and the right where against when it was done in the false pretext of sensitivity. 

I posted a picture here of some of the pages in the books you’re referring to that are being shown to young children in school and Tumblr removed the post on the grounds of it being pornographic.

I’m perfectly okay with banning actual pornography - illustrations of teenagers performing sexual acts upon older men, etc. - from classrooms, and, 10, 15 years ago, almost all left-wing people would have been okay with that too. If you’re saying that’s something that has changed in the meantime, that’s their problem and that’s on them.

“”“Banned”“”

The definition of the word, as it’s being used, does not fit the actual situation. Banned means they’re not allowed anywhere. The books aren’t banned, they’re just not allowed to teach what is obviously adult content to children. If you’re an adult, you’re still free to read those books.

Leftists: Come here little children, come into my van, we have sweets for you.

Sane People: No.

Leftists: OMG WHY DO YOU HATE GAY PEOPLE SO MUCH?!!!

beardedmrbean:

Riveting conversation here

(via ophilosoraptoro)

unclefather:

image

WHY ARE YOU CLOSING YOUR DOORS TO THE PUBLIC!!!!

(via witch-hattery)

Anonymous:

What’s your thoughts on the Supreme Courts decision on allowing that woman to ban Gay people from her business?

napalmlipgloss:

capitalism-and-analytics:

honeyriot:

capitalism-and-analytics:

Once again, I have no clue on the legality of their decision, but from a moral perspective, I do not think people should be forced to provide services or labor for things they do not agree with. This is true on both sides of this scenario: a Gay website designer should not have to design a website that is pro-Christian nor should a Christian website designer have to design a website that they believe violates their religious beliefs.

Additionally, I am unsure as to why anyone would want to support a business that openly is against them. This is some wild “LET ME SUPPORT MY ENEMY!” type stuff.

Pro fascism account

image

Yeah i absolutely love that they called the person who doesn’t believe in forcing people to do things against their will the one being fascist.

You can’t make this shit up.

In Australia, leftists changed the laws so it is now legal to refuse service and employment etc to whites, straights, etc, and they want the constitution altered to permanently install political positions as a reward to the correct skin color.

Leftists lurv racism. They just claim it is good when they do it.

Imagine if black history was made into a musical, but only whites were allowed. How well would that go over?

And look at Moana? The live actress was a whisker lighter?

blitzz1:

thumperjoey68:

image

Always reblog and educate the idiots

(via unindoctrinated125)

Watch “Germany moves to BAN MEAT. Whats going on with FARMING…?” on YouTube

The WEF moves to ban meat?

Germans vill eat ze bugz - or zey will get ze vhips!

The Nazis and communists merged, and now they soar over us in private jets, lecturing us on how we need to be poor and live small lives.


Leftists rule the West. They just wear business suits now.

We don’t want you. Fuck off.

beardedmrbean:

uncle-mojave:

voltaspistol:

image

Great news lads! The year is 2023 and mankind has finally invented…. Sailing ships.

image

They’ve been talking about this for years now, seen several different designs and estimates for fuel savings and carbon emission reduction.

might be a trick or two to retrofitting some of the container ships, but if they can manage it the cost of shipping both in dollars spent and pollution will drop a fair deal. That and depending on the area they’re running shipping through it could speed it up in places too.

I’m extremely dubious. The scaling up would be a profound problem. What I can see is the wef forcing a return to sail, but I can’t see how the design shown could work.

angrybell:

image

This is clearly the after-life for all who failed to listen to Saint Greta,

image

Originally posted by slvtkovia

(via witch-hattery)